"Rarity rating" is a half-baked idea with values that would go something like this
0 - do not place - unique, easter egg or special (example: Fishysticks) 1 - do not place - not necessarily unique but not to be used without reason (example: Galur Rithari's vampirism cure papers) 2 - check first - no more than a few copies per province, note where used (example: Peryiton) 3 - rare, should not be used indiscriminately (example: Sermons of Vivec) 4-5+ - uncommon or common, rely on price for rarity
0 - do not place - unique, easter egg or special (example: Fishysticks) 1 - do not place - not necessarily unique but not to be used without reason (example: Galur Rithari's vampirism cure papers) 2 - check first - no more than a few copies per province, note where used (example: Peryiton) 3 - rare, should not be used indiscriminately (example: Sermons of Vivec) 4-5+ - uncommon or common, rely on price for rarity
Also, an additional field with "year added + T_D version" could help assess how often books have been placed outside of the main files
This would be extremely useful, expecially if the info is passed on to interior modders. Not a half-baked idea at all. The difference between uncommon and common should probably be harder, so to speak. Combine this with a Books by Subject value like this and it will become very easy to select which books to place in which interior.
The list is missing some books that were turned into PC or Sky IDs (didn't include PC/Sky books in general, also because many of them were duplicates), and also missing those added by the latest Data
There should be a way to move this out of the asset browser. Google Docs was suggested for people to edit and then submit to a Project Organization thread.
Imported this up to Google Docs and tweaked formatting, added thumbnails. Note to anyone re-importing this as plain text: do not use commas. Apparently translating plain text to a table treats the commas as a new tab/column break, and so it did all sorts of funny things when I tried pushing it into excel the first time.
Comments
"Rarity rating" is a half
"Rarity rating" is a half-baked idea with values that would go something like this
Also, an additional field with "year added + T_D version" could help assess how often books have been placed outside of the main files
This would be extremely
This would be extremely useful, expecially if the info is passed on to interior modders. Not a half-baked idea at all. The difference between uncommon and common should probably be harder, so to speak. Combine this with a Books by Subject value like this and it will become very easy to select which books to place in which interior.
The list is missing some
The list is missing some books that were turned into PC or Sky IDs (didn't include PC/Sky books in general, also because many of them were duplicates),
and also missing those added by the latest DataUpdated with the latest crop
Updated with the latest crop of books and changed the maps entries (they got new titles).
There should be a way to move
There should be a way to move this out of the asset browser. Google Docs was suggested for people to edit and then submit to a Project Organization thread.
Added the new ones in
Added the new ones in internal data, still missing all PT books
Imported this up to Google
Imported this up to Google Docs and tweaked formatting, added thumbnails. Note to anyone re-importing this as plain text: do not use commas. Apparently translating plain text to a table treats the commas as a new tab/column break, and so it did all sorts of funny things when I tried pushing it into excel the first time.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tWoVSg2x-kkEh76tekILn25z4EeFNQrIvHUYJiezLCc/edit?usp=sharing
UESP logs our books and
UESP logs our books and vanillas, there was a call to reject this as an asset years ago and it hadn't happened, so here it is.